Current NewsArchivesContact Us

Using Rubrics to Effect Authentic Assessment of Adult Learners
Jennifer P. Cochran
Shelly M. Boardman

What are Authentic Assessments? 
Authentic assessments are engaging, meaningful problems or tasks that match the content and authentic outcomes of instruction.  They are multistage demonstrations of knowing what and knowing how and emphasize product and process, conveying that both development and achievement matter.  "Authentic assessments incorporate a wide variety of techniques 'designed to correspond as closely as possible to 'real world' student experiences" (Custer, 1994, p. 66; Rudner and Boston, 1994).

What Is A Rubric?
A rubric is an authentic assessment tool which is being increasingly used since it is particularly useful in assessing criteria which are complex and subjective.For most educators, a rubric is a printed set of scoring guidelines (criteria) for evaluating work (a performance or a product) and for giving feedback. A rubric answers the questions:
  1. By what criteria will the work be judged?
  2. What is the difference between good work and weaker work?
  3. How can we make sure our judgments (or scores) are valid and reliable?
  4. How can both performers and judges focus their preparation on excellence?
Rubrics all contain three common features which:
  • focus on measuring a stated objective (performance, behavior, or quality).
  • use a range to rate performance.
  • contain specific performance characteristics arranged in levels indicating the degree to which a standard has been met (Pickett and Dodge).
There are two principal types of rubrics:  analytic and holistic. Analytic rubrics identify and assess multiple criteria or components of a finished product. Levels of performance for each criterion are articulated so the teacher can assess student performance on each criterion.  In contrast, a holistic rubric does not list separate levels of performance for each criterion. Instead, a holistic rubric assesses performance across multiple criteria as a whole. Holistic rubrics tend to be used when a quick or gross judgment needs to be made, or for assessing tasks where the criteria for performance are not easily evaluated independently. Rubrics can also be summative (used to evaluate a completed project/process) or formative (used to give feedback during a project/process.)
There are six basic steps to creating a rubric:
  • Identify the learning outcomes which this measure is designed to assess.
  • What is this rubric to evaluate? Look for models.
  • Determine the salient characteristics/criteria for this measure—ideally, the rubric should focus on 4-6 criteria. 
  • Define the performance levels, indicators (standards) and/or descriptors.  These can be expressed quantitatively (points), qualitatively (descriptors), or a combination of both.
  • Identify the behaviors at each performance level. And finally,
  • Test the rubric, including training of the evaluators.

Why Use Rubrics with Adult Learners?
Adult learners continuously evaluate their learning performance and their progress.  They want to be able to answer the question, Am I getting this?  Knowles (1980) describes adult learners as autonomous and self-directed; they set goals for themselves and seek relevance in the learning process.  Authentic learning tasks speak to these needs of adult learners, and the rubric as an authentic assessment tool helps to make visible the connections adult learners seek between the learning task, performance expectations, and learning outcomes.

Rubric development is time consuming and labor intensive, must be designed for specific assignments, and may be seen to lack flexibility and curtail creativity.  However, the advantages offered by rubrics make them well worth the effort. They lead assessment to be more objective and consistent, and require the instructor to clarify his/her learning outcomes and criteria for evaluation.  Rubrics can also help students to understand what is expected from them and how their work will be evaluated.  In addition, rubrics provide the instructor with useful feedback regarding the effectiveness of their instruction and can provide benchmarks against which to measure and document progress.

For additional information about rubrics and authentic assessment we recommend these sites and books:

Resources for Rubrics and Rubric Development

http://www.winona.edu/air/resources.htm
http://www.winona.edu/air/rubrics.htm
http://www.calstate.edu/acadaff/sloa/links/rubrics.shtml
http://www.cu.edu/academicaffairs/assessment/assessment_toolbox/rubrics
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php
http://edtech.kennesaw.edu/intech/rubrics.htm
http://edweb.sdsu.edu/triton/july/rubrics/Rubric_Guidelines.html

Resources for Authentic Assessment and Adult Learners
http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/oct2003/dobrovolny.htm
http://www.cete.org/acve/docgen.asp?tbl=archive&ID=A032
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/

Knowles, M. S. (1970) The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Andragogy versus pedagogy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge

Bibliography

Custer, R.L. (1994).Performance-Based Education Implementation Handbook, Columbia:  Instructional Materials Lab, University of Missouri.

Knowles, M. S. (1970, 1980) The Modern Practice of Adult Education. Andragogy versus pedagogy, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge

Rudner, L.M. and Boston, C. (Winter, 1994). "Performance Assessment."  ERIC Review 3(1), 2-12.

 

| Current News | Archives |

Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching
© Copyright | AA/EO | Teaching Central Webmaster | CMU Webmaster
Web Policy | Privacy Policies

Teaching Central. Facit News for CMU Faculty Link to Central Michigan University