|
Making Sense of Student
End-of-Course Written Evaluations
By Todd Zakrajsek
End-of-the-course student ratings are
often a frustrating experience for many
faculty. On the one hand, we want to
know what our students think about the
course and to make adjustments to aid
in their learning. On the other hand,
these comments are at times not helpful,
or may be wildly different from one another.
Often, within the same course students
comments are as varied as ‘the
course was really good’ to ‘awful
class and the person teaching it needs
a new job.” It can be very difficult
to make sense of such comments, but there
are methods that can be used to make
excellent use of your students’ comments.
The most important consideration is
realizing that, much like every aspect
of life, there is variability in everything.
Some comments will be very helpful, and
others, well, not so much. Some students
are really interested in providing information
that you can use to improve on your teaching,
and other students try their best to
shock you. The trick is to sort though
the comments quickly and find a way to
make sense of the meaningful comments
and at the same time to ignore or greatly ‘discount’ those
other comments. Most importantly, keep
in mind that regardless of what you think
about these ratings, students see you
teach more than anyone else, and it is
their learning we are trying to improve.
Therefore, their comments can be very
helpful.
To start this process, first sort comments
into categories. Read the first written
response by the first student. Select
a word or two to summarize this response
to place it into a category. For example,
suppose the first question on the End-of-Course
Form is, “What did the instructor
do to facilitate learning in this course?” Your
first student response is, “I really
like the quizzes, they helped motivate
me to study.” Based on this response,
your first category will be ‘quizzes.’ Now
move to the next student and read her
first written response. Note here you
are moving to the first response by the
second student, NOT reading through all
responses by that first student. The
idea is to sort responses within questions.
If your next student writes, “Posting
notes on the Blackboard shell was really
helpful,” this comment gets put
into a new category of Bb notes. Suppose
yet another student writes, “This
class rocks, I loved everything about
the course.” This is a great comment
and should be put aside for perking you
up on bad days, but for now this goes
into a category of “no specific
comments for improvement.” Again,
it is nice to know your student likes
your course, but the focus here is on
what specifically can be done to improve
the course.
If a student happens to write more than
one useful comment within the question
you are reading, jot down the additional
items on scrap pieces of paper. That
will allow you to place comments into
appropriate piles. That is, if a student
writes, “The exams really made
me study and the study groups were also
really helpful,” then place the
form itself in the ‘exam’ pile
and a scrap paper with ‘study groups’ into
the ‘study groups’ pile.
Once you have made it through all of
your student responses for this response
item it is time to deal with the piles.
Set the ‘no help’ pile aside.
You can read through that pile again
later for entertainment, but for addressing
course issues this pile is not helpful.
Next select the largest pile and read
through all comments in that pile. As
you read through the pile jot down a
few notes of specific things you can
change about your course next semester
to address these issues. Continue to
do this until all piles are addressed.
For your final step, place a number
at the top of your notes reflecting how
many items were in that pile over the
number of students in the course (not
the number of evaluations received).
This indicates the weight placed on that
issue and gives you perspective. For
example, if you had 40 students in the
course and ‘exams’ was your
largest pile with 18 responses, then
you know this is a big issue for your
students and you place 18/40 at the top
of the paper with your notes on ‘things
to consider for next semester.’ If
your next largest pile was ‘course
notes on your Blackboard shell’ with
8 items you know this issue was noted
by less than half as many students as
commented on quizzes, and that only 8/40
students commented on this concept. As
you can see, if you have some notes with
the number 1/40 at the top, addressing
this issue may well assist the class,
but only one person in the entire class
commented on that concept.
When this is complete, you move to the
next written response item and repeat
the procedure. As you can see, when you
have completed this task you have considered
many aspects of the course and recorded
some possible changes, but you also now
have perspective on which things are
most important to most students.
For the following semester, I typically
suggest faculty identify 2 – 3 “things” to
change. This technique allows you to
identify those items that will have the
greatest impact on the course. As you
can see, this approach also identifies
ways to “discount” those
off-the-wall comments. Now, comments
such as “Your clothes are out of
date, you need a new wardrobe,” are
quickly sorted into the ‘not helpful’ pile
and set aside. No more dwelling on those
comments and instead you spend time on
the issues that impact most of the students.
Resource for this Article
Zakrajsek,
T. (2006). Using evaluation data to improve
teaching effectiveness. In Peter Seldin
(Ed.), Evaluating faculty performance:
A practical guide to assessing teaching,
research, and service. Bolton MA: Anker
Publishing.
|
|